![]() ![]() Later, the accused were charged with criminal offences under Section 302, 323, 341, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. In the instant case, one of the respondents has committed the murder of the appellant’s aunt in the field and along with his other members has also injured the appellant by hurting them through knives. Īn analysis of the case of State of Rajasthan v. This was decided in the latest landmark judgement of the case State of Rajasthan v. It is important to know whether an acquittal who is charged for heinous crimes is eligible for public employment under the benefit of the doubt. Even if the slightest doubt is observed, no matter how small it is, an accused gets the benefit. No such doubt should occur whether an accused is guilty or not. In criminal cases, all the allegations need to be proven beyond all the reasonable doubts that an ordinary man can have. Under this concept, the defendant is considered to be acquitted by the court if his or her offence has not been established, which means when the prosecution fails to provide the legal evidence against the defendant or an accused of the offence he or she has committed. This concept in the legal term is known as ‘Benefit of the doubt’. Similarly, under law, no person is guilty unless and until not proven to be beyond a reasonable doubt. Contentions of the appellant (State of Rajasthan)Īccording to the general perspective, no person is guilty unless proven to be.An analysis of the case of State of Rajasthan v. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |